Multi-species Action Plan for Banff National Park of Canada
Species at Risk Act
Action Plan Series
2026
Long description for cover image
The cover page is a photo of Bow Lake in Banff National Park with mountains in the background and people standing along the rocky shoreline. Photo credit: Sophie Deschamps
On this page
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Executive Summary
- 1. Context
- 2. Site-based population and distribution objectives
- 3. Conservation and recovery measures
- 4. Critical habitat
- 5. Evaluation of socio-economic costs and of benefits
- 6. Measuring progress
- 7. References
- Appendix A: Species information, objectives and monitoring plans for species at risk in BNP
- Appendix B: Conservation and recovery measures that will be conducted by BNP
- Appendix C: Other conservation and recovery measures that will be encouraged through partnerships or when additional resources become available
Document information
Recommended citation:
Parks Canada . 2026. Multi-species Action Plan for Banff National Park of Canada. Species at Risk Act Action Plan Series. Parks Canada, Ottawa. vii + 30 pp.
Official version
The official version of the recovery documents is the one published in PDF. All hyperlinks were valid as of date of publication.
Non-official version
The non-official version of the recovery documents is published in HTML format and all hyperlinks were valid as of date of publication.
For copies of the action plan, or for additional information on species at risk, including Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) Status Reports, residence descriptions, recovery strategies, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species At Risk Public Registry Footnote 1.
Cover illustration: © Parks Canada. Banff National Park of Canada photo credit: Sophie Deschamps.
French title:
Plan d’action visant des espèces multiples dans le parc national du Canada Banff
© His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment, Climate Change and Nature, 2026. All rights reserved.
ISBN to come
Catalogue no. to come
Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source.
Preface
The federal, provincial, and territorial government signatories under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996) Footnote 2 agreed to establish complementary legislation and programs that provide for effective protection of species at risk throughout Canada. The Species at Risk Act (S.C. 2002, c.29) (SARA) was enacted to protect wildlife species at risk in Canada and to complement other legislation in conserving Canada’s biodiversity. Today, SARA is a key contributor to Canada’s 2030 Nature Strategy – Halting and Reversing Biodiversity Loss in Canada, which charts a path for how Canada will implement the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.
Under SARA, the federal competent ministers are responsible for the preparation of action plans for species listed as Extirpated, Endangered, and Threatened for which recovery has been deemed feasible. They are also required to report on progress five years after the publication of action plans on the Species at Risk Public Registry.
Species at risk action plans provide the detailed recovery planning that supports the strategic direction set out in recovery strategies. They outline what needs to be done to achieve the population and distribution objectives identified in recovery strategies, including the measures to be taken to address the threats, the monitoring of the recovery of the species, as well as the proposed measures to protect critical habitat identified for the species. Action plans also include an evaluation of the socio-economic costs of the plan and the benefits to be derived from its implementation. Action plans are considered one in a series of documents that are linked and should be taken into consideration together, including COSEWIC status reports, recovery strategies, and other action plans produced for the species.
The Minister responsible for Parks Canada is the competent minister under SARA for species found in Banff National Park (BNP) of Canada and has prepared this action plan to implement recovery strategies that apply to the park as per section 47 of SARA. It has been prepared in cooperation with Environment and Climate Change Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the province of Alberta as per section 48(1) of SARA.
Success in the recovery of these species depends on the commitment and cooperation of many different constituencies and will not be achieved by Parks Canada or any other jurisdiction alone. All Canadians are invited to join in supporting and implementing this action plan for the benefit of multiple species and Canadian society as a whole.
Implementation of this action plan is subject to appropriations, priorities, and budgetary constraints of Parks Canada and participating jurisdictions and organizations.
Acknowledgments
Parks Canada would like to acknowledge those who have contributed to the development of this action plan.
We acknowledge that Banff National Park is within the present-day territories of the Treaty 6, 7, and 8 First Nations as well as the Métis Homeland. The lands and waters of Banff have been used for millennia by Indigenous Peoples for sustenance, ceremony, trade, and travel. We thank each Nation for their contributions and continued collaboration to nurture our relations to take care of the lands and waters, as stewards, together
Parks Canada also respectfully acknowledges that Banff National Park is located within the traditional lands of the Ktunaxa and Secwépemc Peoples. We recognize their stewardship of the lands and waters in the areas now known as Banff National Park since time immemorial. Parks Canada is committed to reconciliation and renewed relationships with Indigenous peoples, based on a recognition of rights, respect, cooperation and partnership.
Parks Canada would like to thank all staff, partners, stakeholders, volunteers and researchers who have contributed to implementation of the first Multi-species Action Plan for Banff National Park of Canada (2017-2022) and to the development of this updated action plan. The contributions of those who took part in the site-based analysis workshops in February 2023 are greatly appreciated.
Executive Summary
This Multi-species Action Plan for Banff National Park of Canada updates and replaces content in the 2017 action plan for the siteFootnote 3. Itapplies to lands and waters occurring within the boundaries of Banff National Park of Canada (BNP). The plan identifies measures to conserve or recover SARA-listed species and species of conservation concern that regularly occurFootnote 4 in BNP and fulfills SARA s47 requirements for those species that require an action plan.
20 species that regularly occur in BNP are addressed in this action plan: 15 SARA-listed species and 5 additional species of conservation concern, e.g., COSEWIC assessed but not SARA-listed. Eleven of the SARA-listed species are Endangered or Threatened (and require an action plan as per SARA) and 4 are Special Concern. Including non-SARA-listed species of conservation concern provides a comprehensive plan for species conservation and recovery at the site.

Long description of diagram
A donut diagram showing this action plan covers 20 total species, including 5 Endangered species, 6 Threatened species, 4 Special Concern species and 5 non-SARA listed species of conservation concern.
8 site-based population and distribution objectives are identified in this plan and represent the site’s contribution to range-wide objectives for the species as identified in SARA recovery strategies and management plans. Measuring progress towards achieving site-based objectives over time will determine the ecological impacts of implementing the action plan.
Conservation and recovery measures were developed to mitigate the main threatsFootnote 5 to the species within the park. The five main threats to species addressed within this action plan are:

Long description of diagram
Five graphic bubbles depicting the five main threats to species at risk in BNP which are: recreational activities, invasive non-native plants and animals, roads and railroads, dams and water management, fire and fire suppression.
53 conservation and recovery measures are identified as commitments in this action plan. An additional 12 measures will be implemented if resources and/or partnerships become available to support the work. The number of committed measures and their action categorizationsFootnote 6 are presented below:

Long description of diagram
Seven graphic bubbles depicting seven recovery action categories in BNP which are: 24 land and water management, 14 research and monitoring, 6 species management, 5 conservation planning and design, 2 partnerships and collaboration, 1 awareness raising, 1 legal and policy frameworks.
No critical habitat is identified in this action plan. Measures to protect critical habitat already identified for species addressed in this plan are described.
The financial cost to implement this MSAP will be borne by Parks Canada, and through partnerships if resources become available. The main costs of implementing the measures in this plan are expected to be minimal. The core recovery strategies in the updated plan remain consistent with those in the 2017 version, focusing on conservation and recovery actions for both federally listed species and species of conservation concern in BNP. Benefits of this action plan include the targeted recovery of species at risk and an overall positive impact on biodiversity, contributing to federal and global sustainability goals. Benefits also include an improved understanding among visitors to BNP of species at risk, increased support for the protection and recovery of these species, and the continued recovery of and opportunity to view plains bison, a culturally significant species.
Progress toward implementation of this action plan and meeting the site-based population and distribution objectives will be assessed annually and a report summarizing the results will be published on the Species at Risk Public Registry after five years, as per section 55 of SARA.
1. Context
This Multi-species Action Plan for Banff National Park of Canada updates and replaces content in the 2017 action plan (Parks Canada Agency 2017). Under Section 52 of the Species at Risk Act, the competent minister may amend an action plan at any time. An amendment is being undertaken now to update species information and integrate knowledge and new information gained during implementation of the 2017 action plan. The five-year implementation report for the 2017 multi-species action plan (MSAP) is available on the Species at Risk Public Registry.
1.1 Parks Canada Multi-species Action Planning
Parks Canada (PC) takes a multi-species, site-based approach to action planning that identifies and prioritizes conservation and recovery measures for a suite of species at one or more Parks Canada sites. This approach enables Parks Canada to consider the needs of multiple species and identify and prioritize measures that can be implemented at the site(s) to provide the greatest contributions to species conservation and recovery. Parks Canada multi-species action plans focus on lands and waters under Parks Canada’s administration.
The action planning process considers a suite of species that occur regularly at the site(s), including species at risk listed in Schedule 1 of SARA, species assessed by COSEWIC and under consideration for addition to Schedule 1 of SARA, provincially listed species, and other species of interest, including those of cultural importance. Inclusion of species that don’t require a SARA action plan enables Parks Canada to take a holistic approach and develop a comprehensive plan for species conservation and recovery at the site(s).
In many cases, several federal and provincial recovery strategies and plans, management plans, and action plans have been prepared for the species included in this action plan. Along with COSEWIC status assessments, those documents provide guidance for the recovery of individual species, including the identification of threats, recovery objectives, strategic direction to achieve objectives, and critical habitat. This action plan was developed and will be implemented in a manner that is consistent with those recovery documents and should be viewed as part of this body of linked strategies and plans.
Parks Canada’s approach to multi-species action planning aligns with the Pan-Canadian Approach to Transforming Species at Risk Conservation in Canada (Canadian Wildlife Service, 2018). It considers priorities of landscape-scale conservation, ecological connectivity, climate-smart conservation, Indigenous conservation, and cultural species. In addition, Parks Canada is increasingly using the adaptive management framework Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation (i.e., Conservation Standards) to support and inform the action planning process.
Implementation of the conservation and recovery measures identified in these action plans is often integrated into the existing framework of Parks Canada conservation programs. Ecological integrity is a cornerstone of Parks Canada’s mandate to protect and promote significant examples of Canada’s natural heritage. It is the first priority in the maintenance of Canada’s National Parks. In addition to the protections provided under SARA, species at risk, their residences, and their habitat in Parks Canada places are often protected under additional federal acts and regulations, including but not limited to the Migratory Birds Convention Act and regulations, the Fisheries Act, the Canada National Parks Act, and the Canada National Marine Conservation Areas Act.
1.2 Banff National Park
Banff National Park protects 6,641 km2 of the Eastern Ranges and Main Ranges of the Rocky Mountains, extending from the peaks and glaciers of the Continental Divide to the mid-elevation montane forests of the Bow River Valley and the east slopes. The park is adjacent to Kootenay and Yoho national parks and Mount Assiniboine Provincial Park to the west. These parks, together with Jasper National Park and Mount Robson and Hamber provincial parks, form a 20,069 km2 protected area that has been designated the UNESCO Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks World Heritage Site. There are also several Alberta provincial parks and wilderness areas adjacent to the east boundary of the park.
Banff National Park encompasses the entire upper portion of the Bow River watershed, and the North Saskatchewan River watershed. Park elevations range from approximately 1300m where the Bow River exits the park, to nearly 3500m along the Continental Divide. Precipitation levels decrease from west to east, and snowfall in particular is more abundant near the divide. The main ecosystem disturbance factors are wildfire, forest insects, avalanches, and fluvial erosion and deposition. This complex mountainous landscape supports diverse ecosystems that include alpine meadows, moist subalpine forests, open shrub avalanche slopes, rich riparian zones and alluvial flats, and open montane forests and grasslands. These ecosystems support a high diversity of species, a number of which are at risk, or are of conservation concern.
1.3 Scope of the action plan
Although it was included in the previous action plan, the Ya-Ha Tinda ranch, a federal Crown property managed by Parks Canada, is not included in this amendment. The Ya Ha Tinda ranch was designated an Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measure in 2024 (https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/nature-legacy/other-effective-area-based-measures.html). Species at risk considerations for the Ya Ha Tinda ranch are included in the site’s Resource Protection Plan (Parks Canada 2023).
1.3.1. Geographic scope
The geographic scope of this action plan includes all federal lands and waters within Banff National Park (Figure 1). This multi-species action plan has been written specifically for BNP to fulfill Parks Canada’s legal responsibilities, and to respond to specific threats, legislation, and management priorities at this site, which may differ in areas outside the site. However, this plan has been developed and will be implemented collaboratively with partners in the broader landscape to maximize conservation benefits to species conservation and recovery.
Text description
Figure 1 is a map of Banff National Park showing Highway 1, the town of Banff and village of Lake Louise.
1.3.2. Species scope
This action plan addresses a total of 15 SARA-listed species plus 5 species of conservation concern that regularly occur in BNP (Table 1). This includes 11 SARA-listed Endangered or Threatened species (for which an action plan is required under s.47 of SARA) and 4 SARA-listed Special Concern species. Note that over the course of implementation of this action plan, some species’ COSEWIC assessment or SARA status may change.
| Species | Scientific Name | COSEWIC Status | SARA Schedule 1 Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Banff Springs Snail | Physella johnsoni | Endangered | Endangered |
| Bank Swallow | Riparia riparia | Threatened | Threatened |
| Barn Swallow | Hirundo rustica | Special Concern | Threatened |
| Black Swift | Cypseloides niger | Endangered | Endangered |
| Bull Trout, Saskatchewan – Nelson Rivers populations | Salvelinus confluentus | Threatened | Threatened |
| Eastern Red Bat | Lasiurus borealis | Endangered | Not Listed |
| Grizzly Bear Western population | Ursus arctos | Special Concern | Special Concern |
| Hoary Bat | Lasiurus cinereus | Endangered | Not Listed |
| Limber Pine | Pinus flexilis | Endangered | Not Listed |
| Little Brown Myotis | Myotis lucifugus | Endangered | Endangered |
| Northern Myotis | Myotis septentrionalis | Endangered | Endangered |
| Plains Bison | Bison bison bison | Threatened | Not Listed |
| Silver-haired Bat | Lasionycteris noctivagans | Endangered | Not Listed |
| Vivid Dancer | Argia vivida | Special Concern | Special Concern |
| Western Bumble Bee Occidentalis subspecies | Bombus occidentalis occidentalis | Threatened | Threatened |
| Western Toad Non-Calling populations | Anaxyrus boreas | Special Concern | Special Concern |
| Westslope Cutthroat Trout Alberta population | Oncorhynchus clarkii lewisi | Threatened | Threatened |
| Whitebark Pine | Pinus albicaulis | Endangered | Endangered |
| Wolverine | Gulo gulo | Special Concern | Special Concern |
| Woodland Caribou Southern Mountain Population | Rangifer tarandus | Endangered (Caribou, Central Mountain population) | Threatened |
2. Site-based population and distribution objectives
The potential for Parks Canada to undertake direct management action at the site that will measurably contribute to the recovery of each species was assessed. Site-specific population and distribution objectives were developed for 8 species (Appendix A). These objectives identify the contribution that conservation and recovery measures implemented by the site or in collaboration with partners can make towards achieving the national objectives identified in SARA recovery strategies and management plans.
Monitoring progress towards achieving the site-based objectives over time will help determine whether implementation of the conservation and recovery measures (identified in Appendix B) is having the desired influence on species recovery.
For several species, Parks Canada’s primary contribution to conservation is ensuring that protection measures are maintained to protect species and their habitats. In these cases, recovery cannot be measurably influenced by site-level management actions, and therefore, setting site-specific population and distribution objectives are not appropriate. This may be due to one or more of the following circumstances within the site: (1) there are no or few known threats; (2) there are no feasible management actions to address threats; or (3) only a small portion of the species range is within the site and therefore the impact of management actions cannot be measured. In such cases, conservation efforts may be limited to protection measures in place under federal legislation, including the Canada National Parks Act, the Impact Assessment Act, the Fisheries Act, the Migratory Birds Convention Act, and SARA. Additional efforts may include indirect threat mitigations such as education and outreach, habitat maintenance, and addressing knowledge gaps through inventory, research, and monitoring.
3. Conservation and recovery measures
Conservation and recovery measures aimed at addressing threats to the species at the site and making progress towards achieving site-based population and distribution objectives were identified and prioritized. The prioritization primarily considered ecological effectiveness but also considered opportunities to integrate priorities under the Pan-Canadian Approach to Transforming Species at Risk Conservation in Canada, strengthen partnerships, increase the value of visitor experience at the park, and increase awareness through external relations. Prioritization also considered budgetary opportunities and constraints. Wherever possible, PC is taking an ecosystem approach, prioritizing measures that benefit multiple species to maximize the effectiveness and efficiency of species protection and recovery.
In total, 53 conservation and recovery measures are identified for implementation by PC in BNP (Appendix B). An additional 12 measures will be encouraged through partnerships or when additional resources become available (Appendix C). Each measure is associated with one or more identified threats. The five main threats addressed in this action plan are: recreational activities; invasive non-native plants & animals; roads and railroads; dams & water management/use; and fire and fire suppression. Each measure is also associated with a desired outcome and the anticipated timeline for achieving the desired outcome. Desired outcomes are designed to be quantifiable and achievable over the implementation period of this plan.
3.1 Conservation and recovery measure approaches
The identification and prioritization of conservation and recovery measures considered opportunities to integrate the following recovery measure approaches: landscape-scale conservation, climate-smart conservation, ecological connectivity, and Conservation Standards.
Landscape-scale Conservation:
Conservation planning beyond the park boundary increases opportunities for collaboration with regional partners to maximize conservation outcomes across the landscape. Many conservation and recovery measures outlined in this plan require collaboration with regional partners to maximize their success.
Climate-smart Conservation:
Climate change projections, impacts and vulnerabilities were considered when developing the recovery measures outlined in this plan. The goal was to develop a climate-smart action plan, including measures expected to be sustainable and effective based on projected climate change scenarios.
Ecological Connectivity:
Ecological connectivity is a key consideration for species at risk planning and recovery. This is particularly important for wide-ranging species, both terrestrial and aquatic (e.g., grizzly bear and trout), and increasingly important as trends in park visitation and associated infrastructure continue to rise. Several conservation and recovery measures outlined in this plan focus on removing barriers and ensuring connectivity is maintained or restored for key species.
Conservation Standards:
Conservation Standards is increasingly being used by Parks Canada to support action planning, particularly with species for which implementing a shared adaptive management framework at a regional scale will improve conservation outcomes, e.g., five- needle pines.
3.2 Classification of measures
Measures identified in this plan are categorized based on Conservation Measures Partnership (CMP) Conservation Actions ClassificationsFootnote 7. The following action classifications are addressed in this plan:
Land / Water Management:
Many conservation and recovery measures detailed in this plan involve direct management or restoration of sites or ecosystems in the park. Prescribed fire, forest thinning, tree planting, creating alternate travel routes, restoring water flow, and removing non-native species are some of the active management tools that Parks Canada uses for species recovery. Visitor management is another important tool used to protect sensitive species and their important habitats from disturbance or displacement, and to prevent the introduction of invasive species.
Species Management:
In some instances, direct management or restoration of species is necessary for recovery. This plan includes species reintroductions to historically occupied areas (e.g., bull trout and westslope cutthroat trout), active management to ensure the success of previous introductions (e.g., plains bison), and seed collection to conserve genetic diversity.
Conservation Designation & Planning:
Planning restoration activities is an essential early step in species recovery. Parks Canada will develop species-specific restoration and operational plans to guide future actions for recovery of species such as plains bison and five-needle pines.
Applied Research & Monitoring:
Knowledge gaps represent major impediments to the development and implementation of effective conservation and recovery measures for many species of conservation concern. Information obtained through research, surveys and monitoring will provide a better site-level and regional understanding of species ecology, distribution, status, and population trends, allowing for better protection and timely implementation of active management and threat mitigation. Habitat assessments, species inventory and mapping, genetic analyses, habitat security modeling, habitat connectivity analyses, and long-term population monitoring will provide information necessary to guide future park and landscape-scale conservation action.
Partnerships/collaborationsFootnote 8:
Several conservation and recovery measures outlined in this plan will be conducted in collaboration with regional partners. Parks Canada will work to maintain existing partnerships and cultivate new ones related to conservation issues and research questions of mutual interest.
Raising Awareness:
Outreach and communications about species at risk with park visitors and regional stakeholders garners support for species at risk recovery actions taken in the park. The broad and diverse visitor base that visits BNP provides opportunities to connect with the public about species recovery.
Legal & Policy Frameworks:
Legislation and policy are valuable tools for species protection and recovery. This plan includes implementing new protection measures, e.g., barbless hook regulations to protect bull trout and westslope cutthroat trout.
4. Critical habitat
Critical habitat is “the habitat that is necessary for the survival or recovery of a listed wildlife species and that is identified as the species’ critical habitat in the recovery strategy or in an action plan for the species” (SARA s.2(1)). Where the recovery strategy for a species states that the identification of critical habitat is not complete, a schedule of studies is included towards gathering additional information to complete the identification. Additional critical habitat can be identified in an amended recovery strategy or in an upcoming or amended action plan for the species.
Critical habitat was identified in BNP within the recovery strategies for Banff Springs snail, bank swallow, bull trout (Saskatchewan – Nelson Rivers populations), little brown myotis, westslope cutthroat trout (Alberta population), whitebark pine, and woodland caribou (Southern Mountain population). No additional critical habitat is identified in this action plan.
4.1 Proposed measures to protect critical habitat
Critical habitat identified in BNP in recovery strategies for species addressed in this plan is legally protected from destruction as per section 58 of SARA. SARA requires that critical habitat identified in a federally protected areaFootnote 9 be described in the Canada Gazette within 90 days after the final recovery strategy or action plan that identified the critical habitat is included in the public registry. A prohibition against destruction of critical habitat under ss. 58(1) applies 90 days after the description of the critical habitat is published in the Canada Gazette. If it is determined that any portions of critical habitat are not protected, and steps are being taken to protect those portions, those steps will be communicated via the Registry through the reports referred to in section 63 of SARA.
5. Evaluation of socio-economic costs and of benefits
The Species at Risk Act requires the competent minister to undertake an evaluation of the socio-economic costs of the action plan and the benefits to be derived from its implementation (s.49(1)(e)). This socio-economic assessment is narrow in scope, as it applies only to protected lands and waters in BNP, which are often subject to fewer threats (e.g., industrial activities) compared to other areas because the lands are managed to maintain and restore ecological and commemorative integrity. Further, this evaluation addresses only the incremental socio-economic costs and benefits of implementing the measures outlined in this action plan and does not include socio-economic impacts of existing activities or management regimes in those Parks Canada sites. It does not address total cumulative costs or benefits of species recovery in general nor does it attempt to conduct a full cost-benefit analysis as is done to support a regulatory initiative.
The protection and recovery of species at risk can result in both costs and benefits, which affect various groups of Canadian society in different ways. The proposed measures in this action plan seek a balanced approach to reducing or eliminating threats to species at risk populations and habitats. Potential socio-economic costs as well as the social and environmental benefits that may occur through implementation of this action plan are outlined below.
5.1 Costs
The total incremental cost to implement the measures outlined in Appendix B will be borne by Parks Canada out of existing salaries and goods and services dollars that are integrated into the operational management of the sites and thereby will not result in additional costs to society. Implementation of the measures in this plan is subject to appropriations, priorities, and budgetary constraints. Measures outlined in Appendix C will only be implemented through partnerships or if additional resources become available.
The anticipated socioeconomic cost to Indigenous communities, stakeholders, and park visitors is expected to be low. The park is a protected area where core species recovery strategies are already in place. The updated action plan remains consistent with measures outlined in the 2017 MASP and reflects ongoing recovery efforts that have been implemented in the park over time. As such, the proposed actions do not represent a significant change from current practices
5.2 Benefits
Potential economic benefits of the conservation and recovery of species at risk at this site cannot be easily quantified, as many of the values derived from wildlife are non-market commodities that are difficult to appraise in financial terms. Wildlife, in all its forms, has value in and of itself, and is valued by Canadians for aesthetic, cultural, spiritual, recreational, educational, historical, economic, medical, ecological and scientific reasons. The conservation of species at risk is an important component of the Government of Canada’s commitment to conserving biological diversity and is important to Canada’s current and future economic and natural wealth. Measures in this plan help to meet the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy goal of protecting and recovering species and conserving Canadian biodiversity. It also contributes to the global goal of ensuring “biodiversity is sustainably used and managed and nature’s contributions to people, including ecosystem functions and services, are valued, maintained and enhanced, with those currently in decline being restored” (Kunming-Montreal Convention on Biological Diversity, December 2022).
The protected natural capital assets (forests, grasslands, wetlands, freshwater, coastal and marine areas) of national parks and national marine conservation areas provide a flow of ecosystem services (e.g.: climate regulation, provision of habitat, water supply and regulation) that benefit individuals and communities across Canada. Parks Canada works to sustain and improve the ecological condition of the national network of protected places. Efforts that improve species’ condition and their role in the ecosystem, such as recovery measures in this action plan, have an impact on the overall health of the ecosystem. For BNP, the potential annual value of ecosystem services has been estimated to range between $3.3 billion and $11 billion (average value $7.1 billion)Footnote 10 (Mulrooney & Jones, 2023). Implementing the measures within this MSAP will contribute to sustaining the valuable flow of ecosystem services to Canadians.
Measures presented in this action plan will contribute to meeting recovery strategy objectives for threatened and endangered species and will also contribute to meeting management objectives for species of special concern. Recovery Strategies, action plans and management plans for SARA listed species are an integral part of species management aimed at species’ survival and recovery, maintaining biodiversity in Canada and conserving Canada’s natural heritage.
The measures outlined in this document are expected to have overall positive impacts on ecological integrity, cultural continuity, and appreciation of the park environment and species. For example, outreach and education will improve understanding of species at risk and increase support for their protection and the implementation of recovery actions within the park and beyond. Additional potential benefits include bison viewing opportunities by visitors and the continued recovery of a culturally significant species.
6. Measuring progress
Reporting on implementation of the action plan (under section 55 of SARA) will be done by assessing progress towards implementing the measures listed in Appendix B, and Appendix C when possible. Reporting on the ecological of the action plan will be done by assessing progress towards meeting site-based population and distribution objectives (Appendix A). Progress will be monitored annually and an implementation report summarizing the results of this plan will be posted to the SAR Public Registry five years following publication of the final version. The five-year report will also include a summary of the socio-economic impacts from implementing the action plan.
7. References
Barrueto, M., A. Forshner, J. Whittington, A. Clevenger, M. Musiani. 2022. Protection status, human disturbance, snow cover and trapping drive density of a declining wolverine population in the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Scientific Reports 12:17412
Canadian Wildlife Service. 2018. Pan-Canadian approach to transforming species at risk conservation in Canada. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Gatineau, Quebec. 12p.
Convention on Biological Diversity. 2022. Kunming-Montreal Global biodiversity framework. CBD/COP/DEC/15/4. Montreal, Canada. Available online: https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-15/cop-15-dec-04-en.pdf
Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2017. Recovery Strategy for the Whitebark Pine (Pinus albicaulis) in Canada [Proposed]. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa. viii + 54 pp.
Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2024. Management Plan for the Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos), Western Population in Canada [Draft]. Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa.
Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2024. Management Plan for the Wolverine (Gulo gulo) in Canada [Draft]. Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada. 2019. Recovery Strategy and Action Plan for the Westslope Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii lewisi) Alberta population (also known as Saskatchewan-Nelson River populations) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Ottawa. vii + 61 pp + Part 2
Fisheries and Oceans Canada. 2020. Recovery Strategy for the Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus), Saskatchewan-Nelson Rivers populations, in Canada [Final]. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Ottawa. viii + 130 pp.
Lepitzki, D.A.W. and C. Pacas. 2010. Recovery Strategy and Action Plan for the Banff Springs Snail (Physella johnsoni), in Canada. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Parks Canada Agency, Ottawa. vii + 63 pp.
Mulrooney, D. and B. Jones. 2023. The value of natural capital in Canada’s national parks and national marine conservation areas. PARKS 29(2).
Parks Canada Agency. 2017. Multi-species Action Plan for Banff National Park of Canada. Species at Risk Act Action Plan Series. Parks Canada Agency, Ottawa. iv + 27 pp.
Parks Canada Agency. 2022. Banff National Park of Canada Management Plan. Management Plan Series. Parks Canada Agency, Ottawa. ix + 47 pp.
Parks Canada Agency. 2023. Ya Ha Tinda Ranch Resource Protection Plan. Parks Canada Agency, Ottawa. 24 pp.
Parks Canada. 2025. Population and Distribution Objectives for Whitebark and Limber Pine in Canada’s Mountain National Parks. Parks Canada, Ottawa.
Whittington, J., Hebblewhite, M., Meyer, C., Johnston, B., Forshner, A., Macbeth, B., Einfeldt, A. and S. Cherry. 2025. One-stage spatial mark–resight analysis reveals an increasing grizzly bear population with declining density near roads. Ecosphere 16:e70246.
Appendix A: Species information, objectives and monitoring plans for species at risk in BNP
| Species | National objectivesFootnote 11 | Site-based population & distribution objectives | Population and Distribution Context | Population monitoringFootnote 12 | Site-based Recovery Approach(es) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banff Springs Snail | Restore and maintain self-sustaining populations of the Banff Springs Snail within the species’ historic range. | Maintain occupancy of Banff Springs snails at all 7 monitored extant sites in BNP through to 2035. |
The population found in BNP is the only known population of this species. The population is stable within a fluctuating annual trend. |
A population census is conducted annually at the seven extant sites. | On-going protection of snails and their habitat using a combination of area closures, surveillance, public education and enforcement. |
| Bull Trout Saskatchewan - Nelson Rivers populations | To protect, maintain and recover Bull Trout to self-sustaining populations where recovery is likely, within the Recovery Area. | -Maintain or establish populations of bull trout occupying 234 km of rivers and streams in northern BNP (LLYK Field Unit) by 2035. -Maintain or establish a probability of occupancy of 0.60 for bull trout in first, second and third-order stream reaches < 15% gradient with a contributing area of > 70 ha within each the Cascade, Panther, Spray, Brewster, Forty-Mile, and Altrude watersheds in southern BNP (Banff Field Unit) by 2035. | Bull trout are widespread in BNP. The population trend is unknown but likely stable. | Electrofishing surveys are conducted on a rotating annual schedule to monitor key watersheds. | Non-native species removal, reintroductions and water flow restoration support the persistence and recovery of bull trout populations throughout the park. |
| Grizzly Bear Western population | The management objective is to improve the long-term stability and resiliency of grizzly bear, Western Population throughout the diversity of ecosystems it currently occupies in Canada, by mitigating the primary threats to the species and restoring population connectivity and abundance in the parts of its range where human impacts have been most severe. (October 2024 draft Grizzly Bear Management Plan) | -Maintain a grizzly bear population density (based on a four year moving window) equal to or above the 2012 to 2016 density estimate (8.4 grizzly bears per 1000 km2) across the Banff-Yoho-Kootenay area between 2025 and 2035. -Maintain grizzly bear population viability by limiting the number of adult female grizzly bears killed due to human related activities to less than 1.2%Footnote 13 of the total population. -Maintain east-west habitat connectivity for grizzly bears as measured by the average grizzly bear crossing rate (number of crossing events per month) at wildlife crossing structures along the Trans-Canada Highway at greater than 0.7 between 2025 and 2035. |
Region-wide density has remained relatively stable for many years. Populations are stable in backcountry areas but are declining close to roads (Whittington et al. 2025). Bears in BNP are part of the regional Rocky Mountain population. |
Trends in population density are monitored with a spatial mark-resight model using a remote camera network and marked individuals. Analytical methods are rapidly advancing, as is our ability to combine data sources. | Improving habitat security and mitigating the impacts of roads and rail address key threats to grizzly bears in the park. |
| Limber Pine | N/A | By 2035, establish 25% of a network of component populations (defined in the 10-year 5 Needle-Pine Restoration Plan for BNP) required to cover limber pine range across the park. Each component population consists of >5000 mature individuals from a minimum of 60 parent trees covering 40 hectares.Footnote 14 | BNP populations continue to decline although blister rust infections rates remain low compared to other areas in the species’ range. | Population monitoring is conducted at existing plots every 5 years as part of a region-wide initiative. | Recovery efforts include the protection of high value individual trees, the conservation of genetic diversity through seed collection, and restoration treatments including prescribed fire, thinning and tree planting. |
| Plains Bison | N/A | To be established in the bison management plan. | 16 bison were reintroduced to BNP in 2017. Population growth averaged 33% per year during the reintroduction pilot project (2017-2022). The population continues to increase. | Abundance is estimated from aerial surveys using a novel modelling framework. An Integrated Population Model is in development. | A bison management plan that is developed and implemented supports the species recovery initiative. |
| Westslope Cutthroat Trout Alberta population | Population and distribution objectives: Protect and maintain the existing distribution of ≥ 0.99 genetically pure populations of Westslope Cutthroat Trout, and re-establish genetically pure populations to self-sustaining levels, within the Saskatchewan – Nelson rivers watershed in Alberta. | -Maintain or establish genetically pure (≥ 0.99) populations of westslope cutthroat trout occupying 93 km of rivers and streams in northern BNP (LLYK Field Unit) by 2035. -Maintain a probability of occupancy of 0.25 for genetically pure (≥ 0.99) westslope cutthroat trout in stream reaches < 15% gradient with a contributing area of > 70 ha in Stoney, Sawback, Elk and Cuthead Creeks within the Cascade watershed in southern BNP (Banff Field Unit) by 2035. |
Westslope Cutthroat Trout have disappeared from at least 30% of the historic range in the park. The population trend in BNP is unknown but likely declining. |
Electrofishing surveys are conducted on a rotating annual schedule to monitor key watersheds. | Non-native species removal, reintroductions, water flow restoration, and improving aquatic connectivity support the persistence and recovery of westslope cutthroat trout populations throughout the park. |
| Whitebark Pine | Population and distribution objective: To establish a self-sustaining, rust-resistant population of Whitebark Pine throughout the species' range that demonstrates natural seed dispersal, connectivity, genetic diversity and adaptability to changing climate. | By 2035, establish 25% of a network of component populations (defined in the 10-year 5 Needle Pine Restoration Plan for BNP) required to cover whitebark pine range across the park. Each component population consists of >5000 mature individuals from a minimum of 60 parent trees covering 40 hectares.14 | BNP populations continue to decline although blister rust infections rates remain low compared to other areas in the species’ range. | Population monitoring is conducted at existing plots every 5 years as part of a region-wide initiative. | Recovery efforts include the protection of high value individual trees, the conservation of genetic diversity through seed collection, and restoration treatments including prescribed fire, thinning and tree planting. |
| Wolverine | The management objectives for Wolverine in Canada are: •Increase habitat connectivity in areas with high habitat fragmentation and maintain connectivity in areas with low habitat fragmentation. •Increase Wolverine population sizes in the portions of its range where populations have declined and maintain population levels in portions of its range where populations are stable or increasing. •Maintain or increase the current distribution of Wolverine throughout its current Canadian range. (October 2024 draft Wolverine Management Plan) | Reestablish an average summer wolverine occupancy within Banff, Kootenay, and Yoho National Parks greater than 0.38 (the 2012 - 2016 pre-decline timeframe) by 2035. |
Regional wolverine populations have declined significantly (41%) over the past decade (Barrueto et al. 2022). Very low population densities make connectivity with the rest of the Rocky Mountain population critical. |
Trends in occupancy are monitored using a remote camera network. | Human disturbance is minimized during winter and spring to maximize reproductive success. |
|
Bank Swallow, Barn Swallow, Black Swift, Eastern Red Bat, Hoary Bat, Little Brown Myotis, Northern Myotis, Silver-Haired Bat, Vivid Dancer, Western Bumble Bee, Western Toad, Woodland Caribou |
No objective established because there are no or few known threats acting in the site, no known management actions to address threats and/or the site is of limited importance to the species' recovery. | N/A | Recording incidental observations. | The site will continue to protect individuals and suitable habitat, and support partners in recovery and protection of these species where feasible. Additionally, the site will work with partners to conduct opportunistic surveys for under-surveyed species in the site and adjust management approaches appropriately when new populations are found. | |
Appendix B: Conservation and recovery measures that will be implemented
| Species and Measure Number | Recovery Measure | Desired Outcome | Activity Priority (High, Medium, Low) | ThreatFootnote 15 Classification | Action ClassificationFootnote 16 | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.01 Banff Springs Snail | Continue to protect snails and their habitat using a combination of area closures, surveillance, public education, and enforcement. | Banff Springs snails and their habitat are protected from human disturbance. | High | 6.1.2 Hiking | 1.1.9 Visitor management | Ongoing throughout the 10-year cycle |
| 2.01 Bull Trout (Saskatchewan - Nelson Rivers populations) | Remove historically stocked non-native fish to protect bull trout. | Historically stocked non-native fish are removed from at least one key water body for bull trout restoration by 2035. | High | 8.1.3 Aquatic animals | 1.1.1 Removing invasive species, pests, weeds or problem species | 2035 |
| 2.02 Bull Trout (Saskatchewan - Nelson Rivers populations) | Reintroduce bull trout to the species’ historic range. | Bull trout are reintroduced to at least one priority water body within the species’ historic range by 2035. | High | 8.1.3 Aquatic animals | 2.2.1 Reintroduction of species | 2035 |
| 2.03 Bull Trout (Saskatchewan - Nelson Rivers populations) | Restore appropriate water flows necessary to maintain healthy bull trout populations in the Spray River. | Appropriate water flows necessary to maintain healthy bull trout populations are restored in the Spray River by 2035. | High | 7.2.1 Water level management using dams | 1.2.5 Mechanical actions | 2035 |
| 2.04 Bull Trout (Saskatchewan - Nelson Rivers populations) | Conduct water temperature monitoring in bull trout critical habitat to assess the climate change threat and direct restoration activities to areas that are thermally suitable. | A network of water temperature loggers is maintained across seven key watersheds in bull trout critical habitat in BNP. | Medium | 11.3.4 Increase in temperature fluctuations | 8.1.1 Field Research/Monitoring | Ongoing throughout the 10-year cycle |
| 3.01 Grizzly Bear (Western population) | Refine the grizzly bear habitat security model for BNP. | A refined grizzly bear habitat security model for BNP is developed by 2030 to inform management decisions. | Medium | 6.1.2 Hiking | 8.1.2 Desktop/benchtop research and analysis | 2030 |
| 3.02 Grizzly Bear (Western population) | Implement and maintain seasonal grizzly bear secure habitat areas (with restricted human access) in key habitat areas. | At least five seasonal grizzly bear secure habitat areas have been implemented by 2030 to reduce human disturbance and displacement. | High | 6.1.2 Hiking | 1.1.9 Visitor management | 2030 |
| 3.03 Grizzly Bear (Western population) | Decommission informal trails and relocate official trails in core grizzly bear habitat to reduce human disturbance during the summer season. | At least three areas are mitigated (informal trails decommissioned or formal trails relocated) by 2035 to improve security in core grizzly bear habitat. | High | 6.1.2 Hiking | 1.1.9 Visitor management | 2035 |
| 3.04 Grizzly Bear (Western population) | Maintain and implement timing restrictions on roads to improve grizzly bear habitat security. | Seasonal road closures are implemented annually to maintain and improve grizzly bear habitat security. | Medium | 6.1.1 Motor vehicles | 1.1.11 Implementation of better management practices or land use guidelines | Ongoing throughout the 10-year cycle |
| 3.05 Grizzly Bear (Western population) | Continue to implement temporary closures around grizzly bear predation sites to ensure secure feeding. | Temporary closures are implemented when needed around grizzly bear predation sites to reduce human disturbance and displacement. | Medium | 6.1.2 Hiking | 1.1.11 Implementation of better management practices or land use guidelines | Ongoing throughout the 10-year cycle |
| 3.06 Grizzly Bear (Western population) | Implement seasonal closures (mid-October to mid-May) around identified grizzly bear maternal dens at risk of human disturbance to prevent displacement of reproductive females from the denning area and den abandonment. | All known grizzly bear maternal den locations at risk of human disturbance are protected through seasonal closures. | High | 6.1.2 Hiking | 1.1.11 Implementation of better management practices or land use guidelines | As necessary |
| 3.07 Grizzly Bear (Western population) | Limit the road traffic density at identified wildlife movement hotspots to facilitate crossing of busy roads (Fairview and Whitehorn roads) and improve grizzly bear habitat connectivity. | Measures are implemented to facilitate wildlife crossing of Fairview and Whitehorn roads by 2035. | Medium | 6.1.1 Motor vehicles | 1.1.11 Implementation of better management practices or land use guidelines | 2035 |
| 3.08 Grizzly Bear (Western population) | Maintain alternate travel routes and egress routes to mitigate grizzly bear rail mortality. | The highest priority mortality hotspot area along the rail line is mitigated to reduce rail mortality. | High | 4.1.2 Railroads | 1.2.5 Mechanical actions | Ongoing throughout the 10-year cycle |
| 3.09 Grizzly Bear (Western population) | Continue to implement mitigations (speed reduction, no stopping, vegetation management) in areas with high grizzly bear use adjacent to highways to reduce grizzly bear highway mortality. | Mitigation measures reduce road mortality of grizzly bears and other wildlife. | Medium | 4.1.1 Roads | 1.1.11 Implementation of better management practices or land use guidelines | Ongoing throughout the 10-year cycle |
| 3.10 Grizzly Bear (Western population) | Use prescribed fire and vegetation modification to reduce grizzly bear - human conflict. | Grizzly bears are attracted away from areas with high human use through the implementation of at least two prescribed fires or mechanically thinned fireguards that increase grizzly bear habitat productivity by 2035. | Medium | 1.3.4 Recreational trails | 1.1.4 Mimicking natural fire regimes | 2035 |
| 4.01 Limber Pine | Develop a five-needle pine 10-year restoration plan detailing restoration activities where limber pine conservation value is highest and treatment success is likely in BNP. | A five-needle pine restoration plan is developed for BNP by 2026. | High | 98 No Direct Threat | 6.4.2 Species specific plan | 2026 |
| 4.02 Limber Pine | Use forest treatments (prescribed fire, thinning, planting) to improve limber pine habitat. | Limber pine habitat is improved by meeting 25% of the limber pine restoration targets outlined in the five-needle pine restoration plan by 2035. | High | 11.1.1 Change in vegetation communities | 1.1.5 Mechanical actions | 2035 |
| 4.03 Limber Pine | Protect high value limber pine Plus Trees (putatively rust resistant) from mountain pine beetle with verbenone in areas with recent pine beetle population detection. | At least 50% of Plus Trees are protected with verbenone in areas with recent pine beetle population detection. | High | 8.2.4 Insect pest epidemics | 1.1.11 Implementation of better management practices or land use guidelines | As necessary |
| 4.04 Limber Pine | Collect and store seeds to conserve limber pine genetic diversity. | At least 2000 limber pine seeds are collected and stored to conserve genetic diversity by 2035. | Medium | 8.4.2 Viral pathogens | 2.3.3 Gene banking | 2035 |
| 5.01 Plains Bison | Develop a bison management plan. | A bison management plan is developed by 2026. | High | 98 No Direct Threat | 6.4.4 Operational plan | 2026 |
| 5.02 Plains Bison | Implement the bison management plan incorporating principles of adaptive management. | The reintroduced plains bison herd is protected through implementation of the bison management plan. | High | 98 No Direct Threat | 1.1.11 Implementation of better management practices or land use guidelines | Ongoing throughout the 10-year cycle |
| 6.01 Westslope Cutthroat Trout (Alberta population) | Remove historically stocked non-native fish to protect westslope cutthroat trout. | Historically stocked non-native fish are removed from at least two key water bodies for westslope cutthroat trout restoration by 2035. | High | 8.1.3 Aquatic animals | 1.1.1 Removing invasive species, pests, weeds or problem species | 2035 |
| 6.02 Westslope Cutthroat Trout (Alberta population) | Reintroduce genetically pure westslope cutthroat trout to the species’ historic range. | Genetically pure westslope cutthroat trout are reintroduced to at least two priority water body within the species’ historic range by 2035. | High | 8.1.3 Aquatic animals | 2.2.1 Reintroduction of species | 2035 |
| 6.03 Westslope Cutthroat Trout (Alberta population) | Maintain restrictions on all water-based activity in habitat for core westslope cutthroat trout populations (as defined in the federal recovery strategy) to prevent the introduction of aquatic invasive species. | The introduction of aquatic invasive species is prevented through restricting all water-based activity in core westslope cutthroat trout habitat. | Medium | 8.1.3 Aquatic animals | 1.1.9 Visitor management | Ongoing throughout the 10-year cycle |
| 6.04 Westslope Cutthroat Trout (Alberta population) | Implement restrictions on all water-based activity at priority westslope cutthroat trout restoration sites to prevent the introduction of aquatic invasive species. | The introduction of aquatic invasive species is prevented through restricting all water-based activity at priority westslope cutthroat trout restoration sites. | Medium | 8.1.3 Aquatic animals | 1.1.9 Visitor management | As necessary |
| 6.05 Westslope Cutthroat Trout (Alberta population) | Restore appropriate water flows necessary to maintain healthy westslope cutthroat trout populations in Cascade Creek. | Appropriate water flows necessary to maintain healthy westslope cutthroat trout populations are restored in Cascade Creek by 2035. | High | 7.2.1 Water level management using dams | 1.2.5 Mechanical actions | 2035 |
| 6.06 Westslope Cutthroat Trout (Alberta population) | Restore appropriate water flows necessary to maintain healthy westslope cutthroat trout populations in the Spray River. | Appropriate water flows necessary to maintain healthy westslope cutthroat trout populations are restored in the Spray River by 2035. | High | 7.2.1 Water level management using dams | 1.2.5 Mechanical actions | 2035 |
| 7.01 Westslope Cutthroat Trout (Alberta population), Bull Trout (Saskatchewan - Nelson Rivers populations) | Remove barriers to fish passage (e.g., culverts and dams) to improve connectivity of westslope cutthroat and bull trout populations where this will not increase access for non-native fish. | Aquatic connectivity is improved by removing barriers to fish passage whenever opportunities arise (e.g., when road works are undertaken at water crossings). | Medium | 4.1.1 Roads | 1.1.11 Implementation of better management practices or land use guidelines | As necessary |
| 7.02 Westslope Cutthroat Trout (Alberta population), Bull Trout (Saskatchewan - Nelson Rivers populations) | Implement a barbless hook regulation to protect westslope cutthroat and bull trout. | Catch and release mortality is reduced through the implementation of a barbless hook regulation by 2030. | Medium | 5.4.1 Recreational or subsistence fishing | 1.1.11 Implementation of better management practices or land use guidelines | 2030 |
| 8.01 Whitebark Pine | Develop a five-needle pine 10-year restoration plan detailing restoration activities where whitebark pine conservation value is highest and treatment success is likely in BNP. | A five-needle pine restoration plan is developed for BNP by 2026. | High | 98 No Direct Threat | 6.4.2 Species specific plan | 2026 |
| 8.02 Whitebark Pine | Use forest treatments (prescribed fire, thinning, planting) to improve whitebark pine habitat. | Whitebark pine habitat is improved by meeting 25% of the whitebark pine restoration targets outlined in the five-needle pine restoration plan by 2035. | High | 11.1.1 Change in vegetation communities | 1.1.5 Mechanical actions | 2035 |
| 8.03 Whitebark Pine | Protect high value whitebark pine Plus Trees (putatively rust resistant) from mountain pine beetle with verbenone in areas with recent pine beetle population detection. | At least 50% of Plus Trees are protected with verbenone in areas with recent pine beetle population detection. | High | 8.2.4 Insect pest epidemics | 1.1.11 Implementation of better management practices or land use guidelines | As necessary |
| 8.04 Whitebark Pine | Collect and store seeds to conserve whitebark pine genetic diversity. | At least 2000 whitebark pine seeds are collected and stored to conserve genetic diversity by 2035. | Medium | 8.4.2 Viral pathogens | 2.3.3 Gene banking | 2035 |
| 9.01 Wolverine | Identify wolverine secure habitat areas (with restricted human access) and mechanisms to reduce human disturbance including decommissioning informal trails and relocating official trails. | The disturbance and displacement of wolverine is reduced through the identification of secure habitat areas and mechanisms to reduce human disturbance by 2030. | High | 1.3.4 Recreational trails | 1.1.9 Visitor management | 2030 |
| 9.02 Wolverine | Implement protective measures around wolverine maternal dens found in the park to prevent displacement of reproductive females from the denning area and den abandonment. | Displacement of reproductive females from the denning area and den abandonment is prevented through seasonal closures at all known wolverine maternal den locations. | High | 1.3.4 Recreational trails | 1.1.11 Implementation of better management practices or land use guidelines | As necessary |
| 9.03 Wolverine | Share data with provincial colleagues (AB and BC) upon request to inform decision making around regional wolverine trapping and participate in the regional wolverine recovery planning process. | Regional wolverine recovery planning and decisions about regional trapping are based on best available data. | Medium | 5.1.2 Trapping | 10.3.4 Knowledge sharing | As necessary |
| 10.01 Bank Swallow | Conduct bank swallow sentinel colony monitoring. | Bank swallow sentinel colony monitoring is conducted at least every three years. | Medium | 98 No Direct Threat | 8.1.1 Field Research/ Monitoring | Every 3 years |
| 11.01 Barn Swallow | Conduct barn swallow sentinel site nest monitoring. | Barn swallow sentinel site monitoring is conducted at least every three years. | Medium | 98 No Direct Threat | 8.1.1 Field Research/ Monitoring | Every 3 years |
| 12.01 Black Swift | Conduct black swift sentinel site occupancy monitoring. | Black swift sentinel site occupancy monitoring is conducted at least every three years. | Medium | 98 No Direct Threat | 8.1.1 Field Research/ Monitoring | Annually |
| 12.02 Black Swift | Conduct surveys to locate active black swift nesting areas to support critical habitat identification. | Black swift habitat and occupancy surveys are conducted at a minimum of five new high priority sites by 2035. | Medium | 98 No Direct Threat | 8.1.1 Field Research/ Monitoring | 2035 |
| 12.03 Black Swift | Protect newly identified black swift nesting sites from human disturbance (e.g., climbing, canyoneering). | Restricted Activity Orders are in place to protect all known black swift nesting sites at risk from human disturbance. | High | 6.1.3 Recreational use of cliffs and rock faces | 1.1.9 Visitor management | As necessary |
| 12.04 Black Swift | Protect black swift nesting sites at Johnston Canyon from human disturbance. | Human disturbance at the Johnston Canyon black swift nesting colony is reduced through the annual implementation of a Restricted Activity Order requiring visitors to stay on the marked trail during black swift nesting season. | High | 6.1.2 Hiking | 1.1.9 Visitor management | Annually |
| 13.01 Little Brown Myotis | Conduct annual population monitoring at sentinel maternity colonies to establish a baseline and assess effects of white-nose syndrome on bat populations. | At least one little brown myotis maternity colony sentinel site is monitored annually. | Medium | 8.4.3 Fungal pathogens | 8.1.1 Field Research/ Monitoring | Annually |
| 13.02 Little Brown Myotis | Conduct white-nose syndrome (Pd) surveillance at known little brown myotis roost sites. | The arrival of Pd in BNP is documented through annual guano testing at priority roost sites. | Medium | 8.4.3 Fungal pathogens | 8.1.1 Field Research/ Monitoring | Annually |
| 14.01 Little Brown Myotis, Northern Myotis, Hoary Bat, Silver-haired Bat, Eastern Red Bat | Repeat acoustic surveys to assess the impacts of white-nose syndrome and other threats on little brown myotis and the park's bat community. | The impact of white-nose syndrome and other threats on the composition of the park’s bat community is assessed by repeating the bat acoustic baseline inventory (2021-2023) within 10 years of confirmed arrival of white-nose syndrome in the park. | Medium | 8.4.3 Fungal pathogens | 8.1.1 Field Research/ Monitoring | 2035 |
| 14.02 Little Brown Myotis, Northern Myotis, Hoary Bat, Silver-haired Bat, Eastern Red Bat | Continue annual bat acoustic monitoring using the NABat protocols. | NABat monitoring is conducted annually at 1 sentinel grid cell to contribute to the continental-scale program and detect changes in bat populations in the park. | Medium | 99 No Direct Threat | 8.1.1 Field Research/ Monitoring | Annually |
| 15.01 Vivid Dancer | Collect baseline habitat and population inventory data at all extant vivid dancer sites in BNP. | Baseline habitat and population inventory data is collected at all extant vivid dancer sites in BNP by 2030. | Medium | 98 No Direct Threat | 8.1.1 Field Research/ Monitoring | 2030 |
| 15.02 Vivid Dancer | Conduct habitat and population monitoring at extant vivid dancer sites. | Vivid dancer habitat and population monitoring is conducted at extant Banff sites every 10 years. | Medium | 98 No Direct Threat | 8.1.1 Field Research/ Monitoring | Every 10 years |
| 16.01 Western Toad Calling populations | Continue monitoring western toad occupancy monitoring. | Amphibian (including western toad) monitoring is conducted every three years. | Medium | 98 No Direct Threat | 8.1.1 Field Research/ Monitoring | Every 3 years |
| 17.01 Woodland Caribou Southern Mountain Population | Participate in regional caribou recovery initiatives and learn from the recovery actions taken in Jasper National Park to determine future recovery objectives for BNP. | Next steps for caribou recovery in BNP are informed by learnings from regional caribou recovery meetings and recovery actions taken in Jasper National Park. | High | 98 No Direct Threat | 1.1.11 Implementation of better management practices or land use guidelines | Ongoing throughout the 10-year cycle |
| 17.02 Woodland Caribou Southern Mountain Population | Monitor predator and alternative prey populations to determine ecological conditions for potential future caribou recovery actions. | Future caribou recovery actions for BNP are informed by predator and alternative prey population monitoring. | Medium | 98 No Direct Threat | 8.1.1 Field Research/ Monitoring | Ongoing throughout the 10-year cycle |
| 18.01 Multi species: All species | Develop a Species at Risk Communications Strategy to increase public knowledge, awareness, appreciation, and support for SAR recovery actions in the park. | A Species at Risk Communications Strategy is developed by 2026 and is updated every five years concurrent with Action Plan implementation reporting. | High | 98 No Direct Threat | 6.4.3 Planning for thematic projects or programs | 2026 |
| 18.02 Multi species: All species | Implement the Species at Risk Communications Strategy. | Public knowledge, awareness, appreciation, and support for species at risk recovery actions in the park is increased through implementation of the Species at Risk Communications Strategy. | High | 98 No Direct Threat | 3.1.1 Raising Awareness | Ongoing throughout the 10-year cycle |
Appendix C: Other conservation and recovery measures that will be implemented if partnerships or additional resources become available
| Species and Measure Number | Recovery Measure | Desired Outcome | ThreatFootnote 17 Classification | Action ClassificationFootnote 18 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.05 Bull Trout (Saskatchewan - Nelson Rivers populations) | Conduct genetic analysis to determine the extent of pure bull trout populations across BNP. | Genetic analysis informs restoration actions in BNP. | 8.1.3 Aquatic animals | 8.1.1 Field Research/ Monitoring |
| 2.06 Bull Trout (Saskatchewan - Nelson Rivers populations) | Conduct inventory mapping to determine the distribution of pure bull trout populations across BNP. | The distribution of pure bull trout populations is mapped across BNP. | 8.1.3 Aquatic animals | 8.1.2 Desktop/benchtop research and analysis |
| 3.11 Grizzly Bear (Western population) | Conduct research with regional collaborators to better understand drivers of grizzly bear habitat connectivity at the landscape scale. | Drivers of grizzly bear habitat connectivity at the landscape scale is better understood and associated recovery actions that can be implemented at the park scale are identified. | 4.1.1 Roads | 8.1.2 Desktop/benchtop research and analysis |
| 3.12 Grizzly Bear (Western population) | Create alternate travel routes and egress routes to mitigate grizzly bear rail mortality. | The next 2 top priority mortality hotspot areas along the rail line are mitigated and maintained to reduce rail mortality. | 4.1.2 Railroads | 1.2.5 Mechanical actions |
| 6.07 Westslope Cutthroat Trout (Alberta population) | Conduct genetic analysis of isolated pure westslope cutthroat populations to identify the need for genetic rescue to reduce risk of inbreeding and enhance population persistence. | Genetic diversity of isolated pure populations of westslope cutthroat are documented to identify the need for systematic genetic rescue. | 8.1.3 Aquatic animals | 8.1.1 Field Research/ Monitoring |
| 9.04 Wolverine | Conduct research to better understand drivers of wolverine habitat connectivity at the landscape scale. | Work with regional collaborators to better understand drivers of wolverine habitat connectivity at the landscape scale and determine if there are recovery actions that can be implemented at the local / park scale. | 98 No Direct Threat | 8.1.2 Desktop/benchtop research and analysis |
| 9.05 Wolverine | Conduct long-term population trend monitoring of wolverine density using remote cameras and genetic analysis from hair. | Wolverine population density is estimated every 10 years. | 1.3.4 Recreational trails | 8.1.1 Field Research/ Monitoring |
| 12.05 Black Swift | Conduct research to characterize black swift diet on breeding grounds to help understand susceptibility to climate change-induced shifts in insect phenology. | Black swift diet analysis is completed at Johnston Canyon. | 98 No Direct Threat | 8.1.1 Field Research/ Monitoring |
| 13.03 Little Brown Myotis | Collaborate with partners to conduct a trial of probiotic application at sentinel little brown myotis maternity colonies to mitigate the impacts of white-nose syndrome. | Little brown myotis are protected at sentinel maternity colonies through the trial application of probiotics. | 8.4.3 Fungal pathogens | 1.1.7 Biological actions |
| 13.04 Little Brown Myotis | Locate little brown myotis hibernacula to better identify critical habitat in the park. | High potential hibernacula sites are assessed for use as hibernacula. | 98 No Direct Threat | 8.1.1 Field Research/ Monitoring |
| 19.01 Northern Myotis | Conduct inventory work in northern BNP to determine presence of northern myotis. | The presence of northern myotis in northern BNP is determined through targeted capture efforts or guano sampling. | 98 No Direct Threat | 8.1.1 Field Research/ Monitoring |
| 20.01 Multi- species: Insects | Conduct targeted inventory of at-risk insects that may be in BNP using non-lethal methods where possible. | Presence of at-risk insects (e.g., western bumble bee, vivid dancer, gypsy cuckoo bumble bee, nine-spotted lady beetle, transverse lady beetle, yellow-banded bumble bee) is determined for the park. | 98 No Direct Threat | 8.1.1 Field Research/ Monitoring |
- Date modified :